您是一位 教師,正在起草一封專業電子郵件給家長關於一個關注事項。
學生:
具體關注事項:[BEHAVIOR / ACADEMIC GAP / ATTENDANCE PATTERN — be factual, not interpretive]
我已經嘗試過的東西:
建議的下一步:[WHAT YOU WANT TO HAPPEN — a call, a meeting, parent support at home]
規則:
- 在關注之前以積極或中立的事物開場。
- 陳述事實,不是判斷(「遺失最後 6 次作業中的 4 次」而不是「無責任」)。
- 提供特定的會議時間或回應選項。
- 150 字以下。平易近人的語言,無行話。
為 學生的家人撰寫每週班級通訊。
語調:溫暖、直接、零行話。家人應該能夠在 2 分鐘內閱讀。
包括這些部分(使用我提供的標題):
- 本週在課堂中:[WHAT YOU COVERED — 2 to 3 subjects or projects]
- 即將推出:[UPCOMING DATES, DEADLINES, OR EVENTS]
- 如何在家幫助:[ONE SPECIFIC HOME-SUPPORT TIP tied to current learning]
- 值得分享的時刻:[ONE BRIEF ANECDOTE OR STUDENT WIN — anonymized]
長度:150–200 字。無項目符號 — 僅簡短段落。全程家庭友善語言。
從教師起草一封專業電子郵件給 [RECIPIENT: colleague / department head / principal / district office]。
目的:[ONE SENTENCE — what you need, are reporting, or are requesting]
關鍵細節:[RELEVANT FACTS, DATES, OR CONTEXT]
所需結果:
規則:
- 直接開場 — 在第一句中陳述目的。
- 事實和同事語調 — 無抱怨語言,無被動攻擊。
- 120 字以下。
- 以清晰、低摩擦的要求結束(回覆、會議、決定)。
Paste the assignment, get a 4-level rubric with observable criteria — no vague "shows understanding".
提示詞 4 個欄位待填
Create a grading rubric for this assignment.
Class: . Assignment: .
Requirements:
- 4 performance levels: Exceeds / Meets / Approaching / Beginning, with point values out of
- 4–6 criteria rows drawn from what the assignment actually asks (not generic "effort")
- Every cell describes OBSERVABLE work ("cites two primary sources" not "shows good research skills") so two graders would score the same paper the same way
- Language students in can read themselves
- End with a 2-sentence student-facing summary of what an A looks like
Format as a table.
範例輸出
Criterion: Thesis & claim (8 pts)
- Exceeds (8): Arguable thesis in first paragraph; every body paragraph advances it.
- Meets (6): Clear thesis; most paragraphs connect to it.
- Approaching (4): Topic stated but claim is a fact, not an argument.
- Beginning (2): No identifiable thesis.
Criterion: Evidence (8 pts)
- Exceeds (8): Two+ primary sources cited and explained; quotes under 2 lines each.
- Meets (6): Two sources cited; explanation present but thin in one spot.
[...]
What an A looks like: You take a position someone could disagree with, and every paragraph gives a piece of evidence for it — then explains the evidence instead of letting quotes speak for themselves.
提示The "two graders score it the same" constraint is what forces observable language — without it every model drifts into "demonstrates strong understanding" cells that cause grade disputes.
ChatGPTGeminiClaude
Email a parent about a behavior concern
Raise a classroom issue without triggering defensiveness: facts, partnership, one next step.
提示詞 2 個欄位待填
Write an email to the parent/guardian of about a behavior concern.
What happened (facts only): [WHAT YOU OBSERVED, WHEN, HOW OFTEN]
What I've already tried in class:
What I'm asking of the parent: [THE ASK — e.g. a 15-min call, reinforcing one routine at home]
Rules:
- Open with one genuine, recent positive about the student (specific, not "a joy to have in class")
- Describe behavior as observed actions with dates/frequency — no character labels (lazy, disruptive, disrespectful)
- "We" framing: this is a team solving a puzzle, not a verdict
- One clear next step with two time options
- Under 180 words, warm but professional; reading level for busy parents, no education jargon (no "self-regulation strategies")
範例輸出
Subject: Quick note about Leo — and a hand I could use
Hi Ms. Alvarez,
First: Leo's volcano diagram last week was the best in the class — he explained magma chambers to two classmates who were stuck, unprompted.
I also want to flag something while it's small. In the past two weeks, Leo has left his seat and interrupted other tables during independent work — I counted four times on Tuesday and three yesterday. I've moved his seat and set up a hand signal with him, which helps for a day or so, then fades.
Could we compare notes for 15 minutes? I suspect you see things at homework time that would help me. I'm free Thursday after 3:30 or Friday before school — or suggest a time that works.
We'll figure this out together.
Thanks,
Mr. Park
提示The dated count ("four times on Tuesday") does the persuading for you — parents can argue with "disruptive" but not with a tally. Keep the log for one week before sending and the email writes itself.