Run in Claude Opus 5.5 (claude-opus-5-5) on 1 Oct 2026; output shortened. Input: a 600-word made-up release-meeting transcript with three speakers (Lena, Daniel, Mei), two decisions and four owned tasks.
**TL;DR** — Fieldbook 2.3 ships as planned on Wednesday 14 October, but without offline sync, which moves to 2.4 because conflict handling still loses edits. Beta feedback moves from email to the in-app form starting with 2.3.
**Decisions made**
- Ship 2.3 on 14 October without offline sync; offline sync moves to 2.4.
- From 2.3 on, beta feedback goes through the in-app feedback form instead of email.
**Action items**
| Task | Owner | Due date |
|---|---|---|
| Email Kestrel Logistics and Brightwater Clinics to explain the new offline-sync timing | Lena | Mon 5 Oct |
| Merge the fix for the Android 14 login crash | Daniel | Thu 8 Oct |
| Redo the six iOS/Android store screenshots and the English + German release notes | Mei | Fri 9 Oct |
| Submit 2.3 for App Store review | unassigned | Mon 12 Oct |
| Enable the feedback-form feature flag in the 2.3 release candidate | Daniel | Tue 13 Oct |
**Open questions**
- Whether to hold the release if the release candidate still crashes on more than 0.5% of sessions — to be decided on 12 October from the numbers.
Where it fell short: all four real tasks came back with the right owner and date, but it also turned a passing remark ("submitting on Monday the 12th still works") into a fifth row. Nobody took that task on — delete the row or give it an owner before you send the notes.